>Better yet, if anyone is brave enough to write an xTalk compiler that can
>call toolbox routines etc (read: modern day CompileIt!) , we'd all be able to
>write our compiled apps in xTalk instead of C. Heck, we could write OpenCard
>in compiled xTalk, wouldn't that be nice =)...
But we'd need real data types then. I don't like the way CompileIt handles
variable types and I like its way to do record fields even less.
CompileIt's way how one does typecasting, data typing, record fields and
arrays is not xTalk-ish enough. So, if we get real arrays, I don't mind.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
