>I'm not going to agree to documented unsupported features. We can put it in
>an advanced section, but I say we support it.
Anthony,
grumble. I'd prefer if it was officially unsupported. I mean, if you feel
like it, drag it along, but it shouldn't be part of any regression tests
(that is, any host should be allowed to error on a variable declaration).
There might Always be an Anthony who says "I'll also update variable
declarations so they still work", but this should be that person's private
fun. I consider variable declarations inelegant. I'd prefer if we kept them
out of the language officially so we can simply drop them when a better
solution presents itself.
>I think I suggested "real" and "integer". I'm tempted to say "rational" for
>mathematical correctness, but that has a quite different meaning in
>everyday usage!
I'd prefer "rational [number]" and "integer". Mathematically correct and
English. "real" also has another meaning in English, so who cares?
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
