Re: OODL: Goofball OT question

[DeRobertis]

At 2:51 PM +0200 on 7/17/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>>Better yet, if anyone is brave enough to write an xTalk compiler that can
>>call toolbox routines etc (read: modern day CompileIt!) , we'd all be able to
>>write our compiled apps in xTalk instead of C. Heck, we could write OpenCard
>>in compiled xTalk, wouldn't that be nice =)...
>
>But we'd need real data types then. I don't like the way CompileIt handles
>variable types and I like its way to do record fields even less.
>CompileIt's way how one does typecasting, data typing, record fields and
>arrays is not xTalk-ish enough. So, if we get real arrays, I don't mind.

I agree that the record fields were awfull. I thinbk, though, that we might
be able to get a compiler together.