On Sat, 2002-09-14 at 21:03, Gerard Freriks wrote: > Karsten, > And others, > > > What is your idea? > > - Can you agree with me that it is possible to proof that information was in > a database at a certain time in most systems? Certainly. That's what Horst's gnotary is about. http://www.gnumed.net/gnotary/
> But most systems are unable to proof what was seen on a screen and signed > before being committed to the record or sent to an other entity? > - What are the consequences of the extreme but defendable position of > TNO-PG? Gerard The logs would show that all the relevant patient data had been downloaded to the client. I think it is asking too much of the process to also verify that the doctor saw it on the screen, was in a fit state to process the data and come to a logical conclusion. In my experience only the clinical note written on the day can concisely log what data was processed to come to the clinical management plan. Having pointers to the relevant data is helpful (e.g. see last entry 5 July 2002; Dr Jones' letter, 26 February 2000, histopathology skin 14 September 2002). I once thought a drag and drop hyperlink might be the best way to do this but text entry is as efficient; just not as cool. Is this what you are trying to achieve? David -- David Guest GPG key ID BE79B742 @ pgp.mit.edu Fingerprint: 2609 DB95 C040 5902 BA0C 4D3C F1F2 EA62 BE79 B742 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20020914/8edd6b8b/attachment.asc>
