>> Lastly, one simple question. How does TNO propose to handle >> the audit trail of signed screenshots simply in terms of >> storage requirements ? >> >>>> > This is a simple problem. > Now every year one hospital needs 1 kilometre of shelf space. Well, the treeware equivalent of what we are talking about here is: Any time I look at the paper chart I'll make a copy of the page I look at, date and sign it and add it to the ever-growing chart, e.g. any time I invoke a screen I should need to sign what I saw, right ?
> Have you ever compressed XML documents? I thought we were talking screenshots here ? Binary data ? Already compressed ? > Have you ever looked at diskspace and prices? Yes, and I have looked at my salary. I am talking GP level here. >>> Making a hash of a screen dump indicates: This is the information as I saw >>> it on a screen and take responsibility for it by signing. >> Nah, I doubt you really believe in the coherency of this >> statement. A screendump merely shows what a screen _may_ have >> looked like. > I think it is fully coherent. Are you telling me you mean "a signed hash of a screendump proves that I saw the screendump" ?!? > To proof that in a distributed environment all informationsystems worked > 100% is much more difficult? > Right? Or wrong? Right. Karsten Hilbert -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
