On Sat, 2002-09-14 at 23:29, Gerard Freriks wrote: > Text as pointers or URL's it is all fine with me. > But he signes what he sees.
I think I've got it, Gerard. What are you signing is that a certain dataset was available to you on a particular day for a particular patient. You are not signing that you have understood or even looked at it but that it was available. Wouldn't a hash of the data be both smaller and a more reliable attestation of the data available? David -- David Guest GPG key ID BE79B742 @ pgp.mit.edu Fingerprint: 2609 DB95 C040 5902 BA0C 4D3C F1F2 EA62 BE79 B742 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20020915/3a1df681/attachment.asc>
