Hi!> From: yampeku at gmail.com > Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:12:39 +0100 > Subject: Re: pass_through attribute in ADL 1.5 > To: openehr-technical at openehr.org > > If it is really needed for the moment for representing templates then > it's OK with me (as long as we agree that this is a temporal thing), > but I still feel that having two separated places to rule UI > generation is a bad idea. I totally agree with Diego. > I think that annotations could work for you (even creating a new > specific ADL section would). > We currently have all the GUI directives for representation in a > documentation file for each reference model (as you can see in this > screen capture http://i.imgur.com/tQxRt.png). This could be extended > to general templates in similar way to the one that Pablo has posted. > on the other hand, EHRFlex uses a complete MVC architecture, in which > the intermediate model (which also depends of your RM) is the one > responsible to transform archetypes/templates into classes that the > 'view' part can then paint.
EHRGen also is MVC but we generate HTML forms for creating & editing clinical records, and a other HTMLs for showing individual records (documents/compositions). Maybe we could share our current GUI directive formalisms to think about a new/common formal way to express all the things we need to generate GUI. I also want to work on generation of reports with aggregated data, trying to reuse what we could for the GUI generation for clinical recording & viewing. Cheers,Pablo. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120111/480d646c/attachment.html>
