On 07-09-15 16:02, Ian McNicoll wrote:
Thanks Gerard,
That is very positive and helpful. Would you consider adjusting to ‘
openEHR is a not-for-profit company established by UCL’ which I hope
captures your reservations about single ownership without giving the
impression that this is a 'for-profit 'company?
As I recall the main subject of the discussion was the openness of the
specifications.
Gerard, as I understand you, you are saying that you will use another
phrase when addressing the OpenEHR foundation in relation to UCL.
You will no longer use the word proprietary in this context.
Personally, I don't care much if you call the OpenEHR foundation
"proprietary of UCL", or "a company owned by UCL".
But how do you value the specifications of OpenEHR, does he still think
the word "proprietary" is appropriate for the specifications?
Thanks for any clarification
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
