Hi Seref, I'm not sure I understand your concerns here. I think the use case is where there is a need to group compositions by some other higher level construct which usually reflect something like an admission, episode of outpatient care or perhaps a community plan of care.
As Dileep has indicated he probably would use folders if Ethercis supported them. Another alternative is to create an Encounter ID for each new encounter (which in Dileep's example, I think I would call an episode of care, and simply tag each composition with that Encounter ID e.g create a cluster archetype to hold this in every Composition/ other_context. I have done that on other projects. So it is a case of looking of all composition with EncounterId = x Now I would probably go down the Folder route, if I could. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: [email protected] twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected] Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 13:59, Seref Arikan < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm used to thinking compositions as semantcally self contained units of > information, at the very least using references to other means of > expressing semantics (as in terminologies) > > What you're describing seems to take some clincal semantics out of the > composion and if we have multiple ways of doing that, it may hurt > reusability of queries and data. > > Do you think we can find a way of expressing this semantcs without losing > its trace within the cmposition? > > (Sorry for the typos, on the phone..) > > On Friday, August 17, 2018, Thomas Beale <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There is a bigger question of how best to model 'encounter' and >> 'admission', which some implementers are doing with Folders, particularly >> DIPS in Norway. I suspect that some version of using Folders (or else some >> kind of tagging, which is semantically equivalent) will be the long term >> approach to doing this. >> >> - thomas >> >> On 17/08/2018 10:54, Dileep V S wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Can you write an AQL to query only on a list of specific compositions? Is >> there any sample for reference? >> >> I am trying to create the concept of clinical encounters and maintain a >> collection of compositions per encounter. I am using AQL to retrieve data >> per encounter and need to pass the corresponding set of compositions. >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> regards >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Beale >> Principal, Ars Semantica <http://www.arssemantica.com> >> Consultant, ABD Project, Intermountain Healthcare >> <https://intermountainhealthcare.org/> >> Management Board, Specifications Program Lead, openEHR Foundation >> <http://www.openehr.org> >> Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer Society >> <http://www.bcs.org/category/6044> >> Health IT blog <http://wolandscat.net/> | Culture blog >> <http://wolandsothercat.net/> | The Objective Stance >> <https://theobjectivestance.net/> >> > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
