On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:31:28AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 6/26/19 9:42 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 14:48, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
>...
> >> If anyone is actually interested in LSB in OE, the natural approach
> >> would in any case be to create a meta-lsb layer that could also
> >> implement the items in README.LSB like adding no longer provided
> >> recipes or depending on meta-qt4.
> >>
> >> Are there any objections against removing LSB support from oe-core?
> >
> > I'd actually be quite pleased with this: there can be a proper
> > meta-lsb which depends on meta-qt4 meta-oe etc and actually tries hard
> > to actually be LSB compliant.
>
> I thought we had this discussion either here or at one of the oedam/oedem
> meetings and decided exactly this. Create a meta-lsb and move the
> packagegroups, images, etc to it.. and have it setup the necessary layer
> dependencies.
>
> All expected to be minimal work and overall minimal maintenance, until it's no
> longer 'required'. (I do think we ARE getting closer and closer to that
> day..)
Is there any volunteer for doing this?
I feel kinda responsible since I suggested it, but maintaining something
where I have zero interest or usecase would not really be a good idea.
> --Mark
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-architecture mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-architecture
