On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 15:33, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Would you expect the yocto LSB kernels support move to that layer as > > well? IIRC, these the the ones that build the LTS kernels. > > No, "poky-lsb" should really be renamed "poky-altconfig" or something > similar, its really a set of alternate configurations we test which > would be defined to include the LTS kernel, probably ith sysvinit > (compared to systemd which we'd prefer as the default for poky).
Personally I see no value in poky-lsb or poky-altconfig moving forward, we think we should just alter Poky as required. There's already several variations on the AB which are not stock poky or poky-lsb (api docs, multilib, systemd, etc), so lets just build variations of Poky. Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-architecture mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-architecture
