> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Phil Blundell > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:10 PM > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed > support for glibc recipes > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:04 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > > > Phil Blundell > > > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:51 PM > > > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed > > > support for glibc recipes > > > > > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > > From: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> > > > > > > This commit message is very terse. Why is this change necessary? > > > > Because meta-x32 layer has glibc, which needs these support files. I > will update the commit message in the tree. > > Can't the tclibc-glibc file go in meta-x32 as well, then? > It can go in the meta-x32 layer, but I think better place for this support file is in the meta layer. It would help avoid duplication of the code in multiple layers.
> p. > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
