On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 16:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On 08/04/2011 08:01 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > From: Nitin A Kamble<[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble<[email protected]> > > --- > > meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-glibc.inc | 32 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 5 ++++ > > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-glibc.inc > > > > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-glibc.inc > > b/meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-glibc.inc > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..823195c > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-glibc.inc > > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ > > +# > > +# glibc specific configuration > > +# > > + > > +LIBCEXTENSION = "${@['', '-gnu'][(d.getVar('ABIEXTENSION', True) or '') != > > '']}" > > why is this specific to glibc and not eglibc ?
eglibc has the same code. > since glibc is deleted from metadata this file should go away too > if its for external toolchains then they could use tclibc-eglibc.inc > or tclibc-uclibc.inc as needed. > > I am in favour of generally using linux-gnu extention for eglibc/glibc > based systems. I think it should be up to the user. We've ensured the recent changes don't change the defaults, you can certainly use linux-gnu if you want (but it will cause issues as not everything accepts that format as things stand iirc). Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
