On 08/04/2011 03:47 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Phil Blundell
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:10 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed
support for glibc recipes
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:04 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of
Phil Blundell
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:51 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed
support for glibc recipes
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble<[email protected]>
This commit message is very terse. Why is this change necessary?
Because meta-x32 layer has glibc, which needs these support files. I
will update the commit message in the tree.
Can't the tclibc-glibc file go in meta-x32 as well, then?
It can go in the meta-x32 layer, but I think better place for this support file
is in the meta layer. It would help avoid duplication of the code in multiple
layers.
oe-core does not need it. It could be deleted.
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
