On 08/04/2011 03:58 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Tom Rini
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:49 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed
support for glibc recipes
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Kamble, Nitin A
<[email protected]> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of
Phil Blundell
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:51 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed
support for glibc recipes
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble<[email protected]>
This commit message is very terse. Why is this change necessary?
Because meta-x32 layer has glibc, which needs these support files. I
will update the commit message in the tree.
Can x32 not use eglibc?
Not yet, x32 work is done on the glibc tip, and eglibc is not there to pick up
the work.
glibc tip is pulled into eglibc svn trunk very frequently. So an
eglibc_svn.bb recipe can get you what you want.
Nitin
--
Tom
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
