> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Tom Rini > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:49 PM > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed > support for glibc recipes > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Kamble, Nitin A > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > >> Phil Blundell > >> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:51 PM > >> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed > >> support for glibc recipes > >> > >> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, [email protected] wrote: > >> > From: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> > >> > >> This commit message is very terse. Why is this change necessary? > > > > Because meta-x32 layer has glibc, which needs these support files. I > will update the commit message in the tree. > > Can x32 not use eglibc? Not yet, x32 work is done on the glibc tip, and eglibc is not there to pick up the work.
Nitin > > -- > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
