On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Kamble, Nitin A <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Phil Blundell >> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:10 PM >> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed >> support for glibc recipes >> >> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:04 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: [email protected] >> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of >> > > Phil Blundell >> > > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:51 PM >> > > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer >> > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed >> > > support for glibc recipes >> > > >> > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, [email protected] wrote: >> > > > From: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > This commit message is very terse. Why is this change necessary? >> > >> > Because meta-x32 layer has glibc, which needs these support files. I >> will update the commit message in the tree. >> >> Can't the tclibc-glibc file go in meta-x32 as well, then? >> > It can go in the meta-x32 layer, but I think better place for this support > file is in the meta layer. It would help avoid duplication of the code in > multiple layers.
Part of the answer here is that obsolete / etc things don't belong in the core, but in other layers that need them. My read on things is that we've removed glibc in favor of eglibc... -- Tom _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
