+Sam maybe not. just looking at "SUCCESS" in gerrit from a csit job means it did not abort. the actual results of the robot suites need to be analyzed.
we *think* there is a regression out there recently. maybe this work caused it? JamO On 02/22/2017 03:39 PM, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > that's good news :-) > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > The CSIT shows the following (first a test-netvirt failure - followed by > success after Sam retriggered the test today): > > Gerrit Code Review > > Change has been successfully merged by Jozef Bacigal > > 8:17 AM > > ↩ > > > Sam Hague > > Patch Set 35: test-openflowplugin-netvirt > > 8:54 AM > > ↩ > > > jenkins-releng > > Patch Set 35: Build Started > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-merge-carbon/105/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-merge-carbon/105/> > > 8:55 AM > > ↩ > > > jenkins-releng > > Patch Set 35: Build Started > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/13/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/13/> > > 8:55 AM > > ↩ > > > jenkins-releng > > Patch Set 35: Build Successful > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-merge-carbon/105/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-merge-carbon/105/> > : SUCCESS (skipped) Logs: > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-merge-carbon/105 > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-merge-carbon/105> > > 9:33 AM > > ↩ > > > jenkins-releng > > Patch Set 35: Build Unstable > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/13/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/13/> > : UNSTABLE (skipped) Logs: > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/13 > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/13> > > 12:14 PM > > ↩ > > > Sam Hague > > Patch Set 35: test-openflowplugin-netvirt > > 12:49 PM > > ↩ > > > jenkins-releng > > Patch Set 35: Build Started > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/14/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/14/> > > 12:53 PM > > ↩ > > > jenkins-releng > > Patch Set 35: Build Successful > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/14/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/14/> > : SUCCESS (skipped) Logs: > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/14 > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-patch-test-netvirt-carbon/14> > > 3:02 PM > > ↩ > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Anil Vishnoi <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I think netvirt CSIT job had some failure and sam is currently > looking at it. He might send a mail if something is > failing because of this patch. > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > So Tomas & folks, how are the tests for the netvirt on this patch > working? > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Anil Vishnoi > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I triggered test-openflowplugin-netvirt as well on this patch > (as they use lot of nicira extension etc in > flow programming), if that passes it will give more > confidence on the stability of the changes. > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Tomáš Slušný > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Thank you for explanation Luis. I missed step 3 when I > was going through test report. At least now I know > where to search for issue and after this last one will be > fixed, single layer model implementation will > be finally finished, because other than this it is not > causing any more regressions both with flag turned > off and on, at least CSIT tests are not reporting any > more regressions. > > Regards, > Tomas > ________________________________________ > Od: Luis Gomez [[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > Odoslané: 16. februára 2017 18:51 > Komu: Tomáš Slušný > Kópia: openflowplugin-dev > Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Test feedback > > Hi Tomas, > > The reconciliation test does the following: > > 0) Enable stale-flow entry feature (otherwise step 5 will > not work) > 1) add 2000 groups + 1000 flows (+10 table-miss) > 2) Disconnect network > 3) Remove 20 groups + 10 flows > 4) Reconnect network > 5) Check groups and flows are deleted from switch (total: > 1980 groups + 1000 flows) > > So what happens with your patch is that the flows (10) > are being removed but the groups (20) are not, so > somehow your patch creates regression on the stale-flow > entry feature. > > BR/Luis > > > On Feb 16, 2017, at 6:57 AM, Tomáš Slušný > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi again Luis, > > > > I managed to get single layer serialization to pretty > stable state, but I have 1 quick question, and > hopefully you will know the answer. > > > > According to test result from flow-services CSIT here: > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-carbon/512/archives/log.html.gz > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-carbon/512/archives/log.html.gz> > > my patch is causing 2 regressions, and that is not > correct count of groups after mininet and controller > restart. If I understand this right, in that test, we are > first sending > > group 1 100 times to each of 10 switches, and then > group 2 100 times to each of 10 switches, so that in > total makes 2000 groups that should be present. And here > is my question. > > The CSIT tests is checking that 1980 groups should be > present, and it was passing before, but on my > changes, I have all 2000 groups present. So, is there > reason, why we are > > expecting there to have 20 groups missing? > > > > Regards. > > Tomas > > > > ________________________________________ > > Od: Tomáš Slušný [[email protected]] > > Odoslané: 12. februára 2017 10:39 > > Komu: Luis Gomez > > Kópia: openflowplugin-dev > > Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Test feedback > > > > Thank you for testing it Luis. > > > > 1) I sort of expected this, because it was a lot of > code and there was a lot possibilities for > mistakes. I need to double check all serializers and > > deserializers again. > > 2) Thank you for pointing this out, I missed the config > parameter that tells to skip collecting table > features when rewriting device initialization > > logic. > > ________________________________________ > > Od: Luis Gomez [[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > > Odoslané: 11. februára 2017 2:48 > > Komu: Tomáš Slušný > > Kópia: openflowplugin-dev > > Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Test feedback > > > > Tomas, > > > > 1) New path enabled looks far from ready, I see too > many regressions: lack of switch info in inventory, > flows not being pushed, stats not reported, among other > things. > > > > > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-carbon/494/archives/log.html.gz > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-carbon/494/archives/log.html.gz> > > > > 2) With path disabled I see you are bringing all the > table features back so its takes very long to > update inventory, topology and register the connection: > > > > > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-carbon/492/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-s1 > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-carbon/492/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-s1> > > > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-carbon/480/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1 > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-carbon/480/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1> > > > > Please let me know if I can help with anything else. > > > > On Feb 9, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Tomáš Slušný > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Hi Luis, > > > > this is gerrit link for model cleanup (serialization of > openflowplugin models directly) > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/51304/ > <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/51304/>. > > It needs to be tested with new path disabled for > regressions, and also with new path enabled. > > New path can be enabled/disabled with use-single-layer > serialization flag in > openflow-plugin-provider-config YANG: > > > > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/50819/8/openflowplugin-api/src/main/yang/openflow-provider-config.yang > > <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/50819/8/openflowplugin-api/src/main/yang/openflow-provider-config.yang> > > > > Regards, > > Tomas Slusny > > > > ________________________________________ > > Od: Luis Gomez [[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > > Odoslané: 9. februára 2017 19:28 > > Komu: openflowplugin-dev > > Predmet: [openflowplugin-dev] Test feedback > > > > Hi all, > > > > Infrastructure seems to be recovered from last days > issues, please send me the gerrit # that require > full system test verification. > > > > FYI I already tried the switch connection patch [1] and > got some failures in the entity owner test [2] > I have to investigate further and come back to you. > > > > Also as I commented this morning, lately I see a very > often issue of switch not getting table miss flow > when it connects to 3 cluster nodes [3]. I will try to > reproduce issue and open bug. > > > > BR/Luis > > > > [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/51500 > <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/51500> > > [2] > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-carbon/474/archives/log.html.gz > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-carbon/474/archives/log.html.gz> > > [3] > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-carbon/469/archives/log.html.gz > > <https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-carbon/469/archives/log.html.gz> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev> > > > > TomášSlušný > > Software Developer > > > > Sídlo / Mlynské Nivy 56 / 821 05 Bratislava / Slovakia > > R&D centrum / Janka Kráľa 9 / 974 01 Banská Bystrica / > Slovakia > > +421 911 083 902 <tel:+421%20911%20083%20902> / > [email protected] > > reception: +421 2 206 65 114 > <tel:%2B421%202%20206%2065%20114> / www.pantheon.tech > > > > [logo] > > > > > > > > > > TomášSlušný > > Software Developer > > > > Sídlo / Mlynské Nivy 56 / 821 05 Bratislava / Slovakia > > R&D centrum / Janka Kráľa 9 / 974 01 Banská Bystrica / > Slovakia > > +421 911 083 902 <tel:+421%20911%20083%20902> / > [email protected] > > reception: +421 2 206 65 114 > <tel:%2B421%202%20206%2065%20114> / www.pantheon.tech > > > > [logo] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev> > > > TomášSlušný > Software Developer > > Sídlo / Mlynské Nivy 56 / 821 05 Bratislava / Slovakia > R&D centrum / Janka Kráľa 9 / 974 01 Banská Bystrica / > Slovakia > +421 911 083 902 <tel:+421%20911%20083%20902> / > [email protected] > reception: +421 2 206 65 114 > <tel:%2B421%202%20206%2065%20114> / www.pantheon.tech > > [logo] > > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev> > > > > > -- > Thanks > Anil > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev> > > > > > > -- > Thanks > Anil > > > > > > -- > Thanks > Anil > > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > _______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
