A feature request is rarely bad. It's all about priorities, and part of "governing" is selecting priorities. It is why I have risen this issue.
This being said, proposing a patch is certainly the best way to induce a positive result. Philippe On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:34:32 +0200 Benjamin Poulain <benjamin.poul...@nokia.com> wrote: > On 08/31/2010 01:38 PM, ext Philippe wrote: > > When one suggests a new feature onhttp://bugreports.qt.nokia.com > > it is currently and apparently accepted or rejected by a single Nokia > > person. > > This can be frustrating when you have users begging again and again > > something, and the request is rejected or put to a very low priority. > > I'm speaking of small features, but details count, and "users are right". > > > > So, I am wondering if an Open Governance could have a role in the > > feature acceptance process. > > It sounds like something that is not on target for the developer in > charge of this feature. You have to understand we get high pressure to > implement some things, and the > > I doubt Open Governance will change the way features are prioritized. It > sounds like the kind of issues were providing a patch is the simplest > way out. > > cheers, > Benjamin > _______________________________________________ > Opengov mailing list > Opengov@qt-labs.org > http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov _______________________________________________ Opengov mailing list Opengov@qt-labs.org http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov
