Henrik,
I, in a way, also represent a large OP from Holland. ±8 million users.
We want to enable the RP to check the data. Based on that data the RP
doesn't have to do that much checking anymore.
I declare the discussion hereby opened ;-)
@henrik Do you already use the AX 2 draft somewhere, maybe in a test
environment?
Cheers,
Chris
Op 16 sep 2009, om 11:53 heeft Henrik Biering het volgende geschreven:
Chris,
I called a session about this at the last IIW in May this year, but
id did not attract much interest. The impression, that I got from
this session and from other inputs is that the community in general
wants to handle trust issues completely out of band (federated
approach) - with PAPE as a partial exception to the rule.
Representing an OpenID provider with focus on identity proofing
coupled with usercentricity and privacy (indeed a very tricky
combination) I would be more than happy to have this discussion
reopened - as we have examples where generic out of band OP-RP trust
is clearly not acceptable to users.
Henrik Biering
=henrik
@netamia
Chris Obdam skrev:
John, Allen,
Thank you for your answers. With validation I mean the OpenID
Attribute Exchange Validate Mode.
In this spec there's a validation required per attribute.
"openid.ax.validation.email=http://example.org/validation/token_via_email
Are there already validation 'types', like 'token_via_email',
described in axschema (draft version?) or somewhere else?
The AXSchema Google Group doesn't seem to be very active anymore.
And of course: how can I help to start finalizing the draft? :-)
Cheers,
Chris Obdam
Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
Op 15 sep 2009, om 19:43 heeft John Bradley het volgende geschreven:
Currently the AX 2.0 work is stalled. I don't know of any other
list.
Sxip was driving it, but is no more.
Some people are using schema form axshema and others are using URI
from openid.org in AX 1.0.
John B.
On 2009-09-15, at 12:07 PM, Chris Obdam wrote:
Hi!
Is there a different list for the discussion about Attribute
Exchange 2.0?
A have some question regards that draft:
• What is the current state?
• Is there a axschema draft for using this version, especially
the validation part.
• We want to start validating in Holland with several large
(internet) companies. And we want to start using the validation
bit. Of course this is a draft, maybe we can participate in the
discussion?
Cheers,
Chris Obdam
Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
