OK. It is not quite 2.0, but a profile of AX. Still, we should do it. The OpenID process is not as lightweight as I hope, unfortunately. It is kind of hard to kick start a WG here....
That is the problem. I am trying to change. But, I suppose we should not be hang up on it and we should start discussing. =nat On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Chris Obdam <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nat, > > This one: > http://step2.googlecode.com/svn/spec/attribute_exchange_validate/trunk/openid-attribute-exchange-validate-mode.html > > Cheers, > > Chris > > Op 16 sep 2009, om 13:59 heeft Nat Sakimura het volgende geschreven: > >> Yes. Let us reopen. >> >> Which draft do you mean, Chris? >> >> =nat >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Chris Obdam <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Henrik, >>> >>> I, in a way, also represent a large OP from Holland. ±8 million users. >>> >>> We want to enable the RP to check the data. Based on that data the RP >>> doesn't have to do that much checking anymore. >>> >>> I declare the discussion hereby opened ;-) >>> >>> @henrik Do you already use the AX 2 draft somewhere, maybe in a test >>> environment? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> Op 16 sep 2009, om 11:53 heeft Henrik Biering het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> Chris, >>>> I called a session about this at the last IIW in May this year, but id >>>> did >>>> not attract much interest. The impression, that I got from this session >>>> and >>>> from other inputs is that the community in general wants to handle trust >>>> issues completely out of band (federated approach) - with PAPE as a >>>> partial >>>> exception to the rule. >>>> >>>> Representing an OpenID provider with focus on identity proofing coupled >>>> with usercentricity and privacy (indeed a very tricky combination) I >>>> would >>>> be more than happy to have this discussion reopened - as we have >>>> examples >>>> where generic out of band OP-RP trust is clearly not acceptable to >>>> users. >>>> >>>> Henrik Biering >>>> =henrik >>>> @netamia >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Chris Obdam skrev: >>>>> >>>>> John, Allen, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your answers. With validation I mean the OpenID Attribute >>>>> Exchange Validate Mode. >>>>> In this spec there's a validation required per attribute. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "openid.ax.validation.email=http://example.org/validation/token_via_email >>>>> >>>>> Are there already validation 'types', like 'token_via_email', described >>>>> in axschema (draft version?) or somewhere else? >>>>> The AXSchema Google Group doesn't seem to be very active anymore. >>>>> >>>>> And of course: how can I help to start finalizing the draft? :-) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Chris Obdam >>>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op 15 sep 2009, om 19:43 heeft John Bradley het volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>>> Currently the AX 2.0 work is stalled. I don't know of any other list. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sxip was driving it, but is no more. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some people are using schema form axshema and others are using URI >>>>>> from >>>>>> openid.org in AX 1.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> John B. >>>>>> On 2009-09-15, at 12:07 PM, Chris Obdam wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a different list for the discussion about Attribute Exchange >>>>>>> 2.0? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A have some question regards that draft: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> • What is the current state? >>>>>>> • Is there a axschema draft for using this version, especially the >>>>>>> validation part. >>>>>>> • We want to start validating in Holland with several large >>>>>>> (internet) companies. And we want to start using the validation bit. >>>>>>> Of >>>>>>> course this is a draft, maybe we can participate in the discussion? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chris Obdam >>>>>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> specs mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> specs mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> specs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
