All the AX contributions made by Sxip Identity are covered by the IPR agreement made by Sxip Identity.
-- Dick On 2009-09-16, at 7:24 AM, John Bradley wrote: > The work at axschema on attribute value verification was part of > Sxip not covered under OIDF IPR. > > I don't think there is a problem with it but I don't know that it > was covered under Sxip's AX contribution to the OIDF. > > This is partly related to the creation of a AX schema that we still > need to get a WG started for. > > I need to go back and work on the charter for that. > > At the moment we don't have URI for AX attributes never mind > programatic validation of the values. > > Perhaps Dick can fill us in on any IPR issues around the existing > work. > > John B. > On 2009-09-16, at 8:58 AM, Chris Obdam wrote: > >> Sorry, you're correct, I started at the >> http://wiki.openid.net/OpenID_Attribute_Exchange_Extension_2_0 >> wiki page. I got confused. >> >> Is there some kind of documentation on the previous discussions? >> The only thing I find missing at the moment is a description about >> the validation types per type. And that's not really part of the >> draft but more part of the axschema? >> But i'm not a experienced draft writer.. :-) >> >> /Chris >> >> Op 16 sep 2009, om 14:47 heeft Nat Sakimura het volgende geschreven: >> >>> OK. It is not quite 2.0, but a profile of AX. Still, we should do >>> it. >>> >>> The OpenID process is not as lightweight as I hope, unfortunately. >>> It is kind of hard to kick start a WG here.... >>> >>> That is the problem. >>> >>> I am trying to change. >>> >>> But, I suppose we should not be hang up on it and we should start >>> discussing. >>> >>> =nat >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Chris Obdam >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Nat, >>>> >>>> This one: >>>> http://step2.googlecode.com/svn/spec/attribute_exchange_validate/trunk/openid-attribute-exchange-validate-mode.html >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> Op 16 sep 2009, om 13:59 heeft Nat Sakimura het volgende >>>> geschreven: >>>> >>>>> Yes. Let us reopen. >>>>> >>>>> Which draft do you mean, Chris? >>>>> >>>>> =nat >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Chris Obdam <[email protected] >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Henrik, >>>>>> >>>>>> I, in a way, also represent a large OP from Holland. ±8 million >>>>>> users. >>>>>> >>>>>> We want to enable the RP to check the data. Based on that data >>>>>> the RP >>>>>> doesn't have to do that much checking anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> I declare the discussion hereby opened ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> @henrik Do you already use the AX 2 draft somewhere, maybe in >>>>>> a test >>>>>> environment? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris >>>>>> >>>>>> Op 16 sep 2009, om 11:53 heeft Henrik Biering het volgende >>>>>> geschreven: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Chris, >>>>>>> I called a session about this at the last IIW in May this >>>>>>> year, but id >>>>>>> did >>>>>>> not attract much interest. The impression, that I got from >>>>>>> this session >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> from other inputs is that the community in general wants to >>>>>>> handle trust >>>>>>> issues completely out of band (federated approach) - with PAPE >>>>>>> as a >>>>>>> partial >>>>>>> exception to the rule. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Representing an OpenID provider with focus on identity >>>>>>> proofing coupled >>>>>>> with usercentricity and privacy (indeed a very tricky >>>>>>> combination) I >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> be more than happy to have this discussion reopened - as we have >>>>>>> examples >>>>>>> where generic out of band OP-RP trust is clearly not >>>>>>> acceptable to >>>>>>> users. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Henrik Biering >>>>>>> =henrik >>>>>>> @netamia >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chris Obdam skrev: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> John, Allen, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you for your answers. With validation I mean the OpenID >>>>>>>> Attribute >>>>>>>> Exchange Validate Mode. >>>>>>>> In this spec there's a validation required per attribute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "openid.ax.validation.email=http://example.org/validation/ >>>>>>>>> token_via_email >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are there already validation 'types', like 'token_via_email', >>>>>>>> described >>>>>>>> in axschema (draft version?) or somewhere else? >>>>>>>> The AXSchema Google Group doesn't seem to be very active >>>>>>>> anymore. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And of course: how can I help to start finalizing the >>>>>>>> draft? :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chris Obdam >>>>>>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Op 15 sep 2009, om 19:43 heeft John Bradley het volgende >>>>>>>> geschreven: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Currently the AX 2.0 work is stalled. I don't know of any >>>>>>>>> other list. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sxip was driving it, but is no more. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Some people are using schema form axshema and others are >>>>>>>>> using URI >>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>> openid.org in AX 1.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> John B. >>>>>>>>> On 2009-09-15, at 12:07 PM, Chris Obdam wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there a different list for the discussion about >>>>>>>>>> Attribute Exchange >>>>>>>>>> 2.0? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A have some question regards that draft: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> • What is the current state? >>>>>>>>>> • Is there a axschema draft for using this version, >>>>>>>>>> especially the >>>>>>>>>> validation part. >>>>>>>>>> • We want to start validating in Holland with several large >>>>>>>>>> (internet) companies. And we want to start using the >>>>>>>>>> validation bit. >>>>>>>>>> Of >>>>>>>>>> course this is a draft, maybe we can participate in the >>>>>>>>>> discussion? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Chris Obdam >>>>>>>>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> specs mailing list >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> specs mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> specs mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >>>>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> specs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > > _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
