Yes. Let us reopen. Which draft do you mean, Chris?
=nat On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Chris Obdam <[email protected]> wrote: > Henrik, > > I, in a way, also represent a large OP from Holland. ±8 million users. > > We want to enable the RP to check the data. Based on that data the RP > doesn't have to do that much checking anymore. > > I declare the discussion hereby opened ;-) > > @henrik Do you already use the AX 2 draft somewhere, maybe in a test > environment? > > Cheers, > > Chris > > Op 16 sep 2009, om 11:53 heeft Henrik Biering het volgende geschreven: > >> Chris, >> I called a session about this at the last IIW in May this year, but id did >> not attract much interest. The impression, that I got from this session and >> from other inputs is that the community in general wants to handle trust >> issues completely out of band (federated approach) - with PAPE as a partial >> exception to the rule. >> >> Representing an OpenID provider with focus on identity proofing coupled >> with usercentricity and privacy (indeed a very tricky combination) I would >> be more than happy to have this discussion reopened - as we have examples >> where generic out of band OP-RP trust is clearly not acceptable to users. >> >> Henrik Biering >> =henrik >> @netamia >> >> >> >> Chris Obdam skrev: >>> >>> John, Allen, >>> >>> Thank you for your answers. With validation I mean the OpenID Attribute >>> Exchange Validate Mode. >>> In this spec there's a validation required per attribute. >>> >>>> >>>> "openid.ax.validation.email=http://example.org/validation/token_via_email >>> >>> Are there already validation 'types', like 'token_via_email', described >>> in axschema (draft version?) or somewhere else? >>> The AXSchema Google Group doesn't seem to be very active anymore. >>> >>> And of course: how can I help to start finalizing the draft? :-) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Chris Obdam >>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation) >>> >>> >>> Op 15 sep 2009, om 19:43 heeft John Bradley het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> Currently the AX 2.0 work is stalled. I don't know of any other list. >>>> >>>> Sxip was driving it, but is no more. >>>> >>>> Some people are using schema form axshema and others are using URI from >>>> openid.org in AX 1.0. >>>> >>>> John B. >>>> On 2009-09-15, at 12:07 PM, Chris Obdam wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> Is there a different list for the discussion about Attribute Exchange >>>>> 2.0? >>>>> >>>>> A have some question regards that draft: >>>>> >>>>> • What is the current state? >>>>> • Is there a axschema draft for using this version, especially the >>>>> validation part. >>>>> • We want to start validating in Holland with several large >>>>> (internet) companies. And we want to start using the validation bit. Of >>>>> course this is a draft, maybe we can participate in the discussion? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Chris Obdam >>>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation) >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> specs mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> specs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>> > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
