I am referring to the URI or referring to attributes.
For email there are:
http://axschema.org/contact/email
http://schema.openid.net/contact/email
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/emailaddress
I have seen others used by OP's
schema.openid.net comes
from http://openid.net/specs/openid-attribute-types-1_0-02.html
the draft you are referring to but there is no host for that DNS
name.
So a prerequisite for defining attribute types like this would be
to define
the URI.
Some people want to use the openSocial schema, or EduPerson etc.
To make progress we need to get a WG chartered.
Yes Breno you can start nagging again:)
John B.
On 2009-09-16, at 2:29 PM, Chris Obdam wrote:
John,
The work at axschema on attribute value verification was part of
Sxip not
covered under OIDF IPR.
I don't think there is a problem with it but I don't know that it was
covered under Sxip's AX contribution to the OIDF.
Perhaps Dick can fill us in on any IPR issues around the existing
work.
Ok
At the moment we don't have URI for AX attributes never mind
programatic
validation of the values.
What do you mean with URI for AX attributes?
This is partly related to the creation of a AX schema that we still
need to
get a WG started for.
I need to go back and work on the charter for that.
Can I help with creating the charter?
Cheers,
Chris Obdam
Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
John B.
On 2009-09-16, at 8:58 AM, Chris Obdam wrote:
Sorry, you're correct, I started at the
http://wiki.openid.net/OpenID_Attribute_Exchange_Extension_2_0 wiki
page. I
got confused.
Is there some kind of documentation on the previous discussions?
The only thing I find missing at the moment is a description about
the
validation types per type. And that's not really part of the draft
but more
part of the axschema?
But i'm not a experienced draft writer.. :-)
/Chris
Op 16 sep 2009, om 14:47 heeft Nat Sakimura het volgende geschreven:
OK. It is not quite 2.0, but a profile of AX. Still, we should do it.
The OpenID process is not as lightweight as I hope, unfortunately.
It is kind of hard to kick start a WG here....
That is the problem.
I am trying to change.
But, I suppose we should not be hang up on it and we should start
discussing.
=nat
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Chris Obdam
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Nat,
This one:
http://step2.googlecode.com/svn/spec/attribute_exchange_validate/trunk/openid-attribute-exchange-validate-mode.html
Cheers,
Chris
Op 16 sep 2009, om 13:59 heeft Nat Sakimura het volgende geschreven:
Yes. Let us reopen.
Which draft do you mean, Chris?
=nat
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Chris Obdam <[email protected]>
wrote:
Henrik,
I, in a way, also represent a large OP from Holland. ±8 million
users.
We want to enable the RP to check the data. Based on that data the RP
doesn't have to do that much checking anymore.
I declare the discussion hereby opened ;-)
@henrik Do you already use the AX 2 draft somewhere, maybe in a test
environment?
Cheers,
Chris
Op 16 sep 2009, om 11:53 heeft Henrik Biering het volgende
geschreven:
Chris,
I called a session about this at the last IIW in May this year, but
id
did
not attract much interest. The impression, that I got from this
session
and
from other inputs is that the community in general wants to handle
trust
issues completely out of band (federated approach) - with PAPE as a
partial
exception to the rule.
Representing an OpenID provider with focus on identity proofing
coupled
with usercentricity and privacy (indeed a very tricky combination) I
would
be more than happy to have this discussion reopened - as we have
examples
where generic out of band OP-RP trust is clearly not acceptable to
users.
Henrik Biering
=henrik
@netamia
Chris Obdam skrev:
John, Allen,
Thank you for your answers. With validation I mean the OpenID
Attribute
Exchange Validate Mode.
In this spec there's a validation required per attribute.
"openid.ax.validation.email=http://example.org/validation/
token_via_email
Are there already validation 'types', like 'token_via_email',
described
in axschema (draft version?) or somewhere else?
The AXSchema Google Group doesn't seem to be very active anymore.
And of course: how can I help to start finalizing the draft? :-)
Cheers,
Chris Obdam
Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
Op 15 sep 2009, om 19:43 heeft John Bradley het volgende geschreven:
Currently the AX 2.0 work is stalled. I don't know of any other
list.
Sxip was driving it, but is no more.
Some people are using schema form axshema and others are using URI
from
openid.org in AX 1.0.
John B.
On 2009-09-15, at 12:07 PM, Chris Obdam wrote:
Hi!
Is there a different list for the discussion about Attribute Exchange
2.0?
A have some question regards that draft:
• What is the current state?
• Is there a axschema draft for using this version, especially the
validation part.
• We want to start validating in Holland with several large
(internet) companies. And we want to start using the validation bit.
Of
course this is a draft, maybe we can participate in the discussion?
Cheers,
Chris Obdam
Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
