Freddie Chopin wrote: > >>> but why 0.7.0 ? for me this is a non-sense ! > >> > >> Any better ideas? > > > > If it's supposed to be a time based release, then identify it as > > such. Think ubuntu. > > Yes... I'm sure Canonical just takes what is in repo and tags that as > a release...
You asked about version number suggestions and I suggested to use a date based version number, using Ubuntu as example, if the intent is to have a time based release. I don't understand what Canonical's process has to do with version numbers? > Isn't their commit/review/merge policy good enough? I have no idea about their policies and processes. Again, what does that have to do with the version numbers? I think that the process discussion is interesting and very important, everyone in a project must agree on process, otherwise it's not really possible to cooperate. Let's continue that discussion! //Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
