On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:35:28PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > Eclipse also uses time-release and they plan > at least 4 RCs. And the most recent release was week late as they found > a regression...
I don't see the point of going into details of RCs for Eclipse and Canonical/Ubuntu etc as they have lots of testers but OpenOCD seems does not. I can't see why you right now want a new release at all. If you do, it appears to be a time-based one. I have no idea who you think the legion of testers will be, my guess is about 4 people. I'm not sure if 4 is an overestimate. I see various people trying to make useful changes (for which I am potentially grateful so please carry on guys!). I suppose the master would be what I'd get if I wanted an up to date version. To be clear: I don't care if there's a "new release" or not. I care even less what it's called although it really ought to have a number that reflects whatever noteworthy changes it has. (Which are?) Or failing that it may as well have a time-based number. Even better if it gets real tough testing but I don't actually see that happening except down the line over the months. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
