W dniu 2013-03-05 22:31, Peter Stuge pisze: > Freddie Chopin wrote: >>>>> but why 0.7.0 ? for me this is a non-sense ! >>>> >>>> Any better ideas? >>> >>> If it's supposed to be a time based release, then identify it as >>> such. Think ubuntu. >> >> Yes... I'm sure Canonical just takes what is in repo and tags that as >> a release... > > You asked about version number suggestions and I suggested to use a > date based version number, using Ubuntu as example, if the intent is > to have a time based release. > > I don't understand what Canonical's process has to do with version numbers? > > >> Isn't their commit/review/merge policy good enough? > > I have no idea about their policies and processes. Again, what does > that have to do with the version numbers?
Just read your previous posts... Hint - you said that time-based release requires no testing or process or RCs, as what is in the repo (after review) is release-quality. Eclipse also uses time-release and they plan at least 4 RCs. And the most recent release was week late as they found a regression... BTW - OpenOCD uses x.y.z numbers and I see no reason to change that, as that gives nothing. > I think that the process discussion is interesting and very > important, everyone in a project must agree on process, otherwise > it's not really possible to cooperate. Let's continue that > discussion! Let's not waste time on such endless discussions that lead nowhere. No everyone must agree - majority has to, but not everyone. We can argue about how it's done for Ubuntu, Eclipse, GCC, Linux, whatever-project-fits-your-line and this leads nowhere other than to wasting time on pointless posting. You have better idea - just give it - if EVERYONE likes it, it will be adopted. Criticizing everything without providing an alternative is "nonsense". 4\/3!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
