In terms of NAND and flash devices, does it make any sense to create a subdirectory for NAND device drivers? The flash directory seems to be getting kind of cluttered with NOR, NAND, etc. flash drivers with no clear organization. I'm planning on trying to get dataflash working once I have NAND working on my AT91SAM9, so there may be future patches for yet another type of flash.
// Dean Glazeski On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Zachary T Welch <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, > > This series improves on the patch sent previously to add bank names. > It adds a 'name' field to the flash and nand bank structures. > > This name must be passed as the first argument to the 'flash bank' and > 'nand device' commands, so the last two patches update all scripts to > add 'set LASHBANK $_CHIPNAME.flash' and use the improved syntax. > > Cheers, > > Zach > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development >
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
