I have been considering another round of reorganization, which would include such restructuring. Such work is very invasive, though.
Please tell me more about future type of flash. I am considering adding a base type to unify the flash/nand code, so let me know how it might impact those plans. --Z On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 08:35 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote: > In terms of NAND and flash devices, does it make any sense to create a > subdirectory for NAND device drivers? The flash directory seems to be > getting kind of cluttered with NOR, NAND, etc. flash drivers with no > clear organization. I'm planning on trying to get dataflash working > once I have NAND working on my AT91SAM9, so there may be future > patches for yet another type of flash. > > // Dean Glazeski > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Zachary T Welch > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > This series improves on the patch sent previously to add bank > names. > It adds a 'name' field to the flash and nand bank structures. > > This name must be passed as the first argument to the 'flash > bank' and > 'nand device' commands, so the last two patches update all > scripts to > add 'set LASHBANK $_CHIPNAME.flash' and use the improved > syntax. > > Cheers, > > Zach > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
