Dirk Reiners wrote: > Hi All, > >> This means we can also, in the future, enhance this to to update a few >> small areas separately, should anyone need that. (I'm thinking large >> virtual textures, etc). Your proposal is compatible with that. > > True, but I'm a little worried about the effort required for making it work > reliably vs. the number of uses this feature is going to get. I'm having a > hard > time coming up with good examples that would benefit from it. I definitely > wouldn't do it for 1, but we could open a ticket to consider it for 2.
Right. I mentioned it as I realized it when I wrote the e-mail, that this enables that ability, should we find the need in the future, so it's a cool thing. But no, I don't see that as something with much priority at all within overseeable time. Cheers, /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
