Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But isn't (a) cdrecord GPL fork, (b) Debian nonacceptance of CDDL
> projects and (c) FSF/GNU anti-CDDL statements not considered as a CDDL
> failure proofs?
It is only a proof for the fact that Debian is no longer a free project anymore
and that some people in Debian ignore their own rules (the DFSG).
Why do you publish this claim at all? You know that there is no license issue
and that nobody from Debian was able to verify the "license issue" claim.
The real reason (some people don't like to cooperate) is not based on license
issues but on personal agressions.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
