Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erast Benson wrote:
>
> > But isn't (a) cdrecord GPL fork, (b) Debian nonacceptance of CDDL
> > projects and (c) FSF/GNU anti-CDDL statements not considered as a CDDL
> > failure proofs?
>
> No, because cdrecord isn't OpenSolaris, and I don't believe in looking
> to external communities for validation of what *our* community is doing.
> Both the BSD and Apple folks seem to be able to work with us, which
> suggests the problem is neither us nor the CDDL.
I received congratulations from all *BSD flavors after I did change the license
to CDDL. Cdrtools under CDDL is accepted by all communities except Linux.
It is a political issue but not a license issue and changing the license back
to GPL would not help against those people who do nt like to cooperate.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
