"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a lot more stability than you get from Solaris (see recent tar -/ > > discussion). > > > > If you like to have a cdrw emulation for cdrecord, you are invited to write > > it. > > Right, I wasn't suggesting that you personally do it. So since 3.0 > isn't final yet, would you consider making showing progress output the > default?
If this was decided today and announced tomorrow, it could not happen within the next 5 years and not before another "final/stable" release was published. > If someone were to contribute a patch for cdrw compatibility, would > that be able to be included into 3.0, or is that too soon? If the code was ready soon and if it did follow the rules: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/CONTRIBUTING this would be possible. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
