On 06/09/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This is a lot more stability than you get from Solaris (see recent tar -/ > > > discussion). > > > > > > If you like to have a cdrw emulation for cdrecord, you are invited to > > > write it. > > > > Right, I wasn't suggesting that you personally do it. So since 3.0 > > isn't final yet, would you consider making showing progress output the > > default? > > If this was decided today and announced tomorrow, it could not happen within > the > next 5 years and not before another "final/stable" release was published.
Does that mean yes or no? I'm having trouble deciphering what you're saying. 3.0 is by your own admission a major or another final/stable release, so couldn't the change be made then before 3.0 is final? Why five years? > > If someone were to contribute a patch for cdrw compatibility, would > > that be able to be included into 3.0, or is that too soon? > > If the code was ready soon and if it did follow the rules: > > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/CONTRIBUTING > > this would be possible. Good to hear. Thanks, -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. " --Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
