"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 06/09/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > This is a lot more stability than you get from Solaris (see recent tar 
> > > > -/
> > > > discussion).
> > > >
> > > > If you like to have a cdrw emulation for cdrecord, you are invited to 
> > > > write it.
> > >
> > > Right, I wasn't suggesting that you personally do it. So since 3.0
> > > isn't final yet, would you consider making showing progress output the
> > > default?
> >
> > If this was decided today and announced tomorrow, it could not happen 
> > within the
> > next 5 years and not before another "final/stable" release was published.
>
> Does that mean yes or no? I'm having trouble deciphering what you're saying.
>
> 3.0 is by your own admission a major or another final/stable release,
> so couldn't the change be made then before 3.0 is final?
>
> Why five years?

Because I grant for stable interfaces.

Whether 3.0 is a major new release is not important if you care about stability.

If I change the output without giving the GUIs and other dependent applications 
a chance tp prepare for the change this would cause a lot of troubles.


Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to