On 06/09/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 06/09/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > This is a lot more stability than you get from Solaris (see recent > > > > > tar -/ > > > > > discussion). > > > > > > > > > > If you like to have a cdrw emulation for cdrecord, you are invited to > > > > > write it. > > > > > > > > Right, I wasn't suggesting that you personally do it. So since 3.0 > > > > isn't final yet, would you consider making showing progress output the > > > > default? > > > > > > If this was decided today and announced tomorrow, it could not happen > > > within the > > > next 5 years and not before another "final/stable" release was published. > > > > Does that mean yes or no? I'm having trouble deciphering what you're saying. > > > > 3.0 is by your own admission a major or another final/stable release, > > so couldn't the change be made then before 3.0 is final? > > > > Why five years? > > Because I grant for stable interfaces. > > Whether 3.0 is a major new release is not important if you care about > stability. > > If I change the output without giving the GUIs and other dependent > applications > a chance tp prepare for the change this would cause a lot of troubles.
I understand, but don't agree with the length of time, five years is a very long time in the technology world. Thanks for explaining it though. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. " --Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
