On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
<o...@lindenlab.com> wrote:
..
> This change in how we do viewer development is a result of taking a good
> hard self-critical look at what was working and what wasn't, and trying to
> find a better way.  It was clear that:
>
> Viewer 2 would have benefited from earlier exposure to residents so that we
> got feedback.
> We were not able to import as much good work from open source as we want
> using the two-viewer model.
> Having multiple large features all trying to get into one integration stream
> to create 'big bang' releases creates delays.
> Doing short cycle scrum-driven development worked well.
> Distributed version control (hg vs svn) worked well.
>
Is there any thoughts of looking at features of the 3PVs and seeing
how possible it would be to grab those features in a "fast track
process"?

perhaps have a poll or something to sort this out??



-- 
Robert L Martin
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to