Anonymous wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > These changes make it easier to configure OpenSSL on Windows.
> >
> > crypto/x509/x509_def.c:
> > 67c68,71
> > ...
>
> Jeff has stated on the mailing list that he's a U.S. citizen.
> What happens now? The changes have been submitted by a U.S. person.
> Is it verboten to put them in? Or do they have to be provably
> independently discovered? Hmm... a denial of service attack against
> open source.
This is not a question of copyright. He has voided that by telling us
without requiring a NDA or similar License. But he has put himself
in peril due to the fact that he has exported crypto knowledge.
All these questions! Does the Legal FAQ have to be revamped and put in
_prominant_ display on the openssl web pages? Or am I just jumping
onto every silly question that only should be given only a
RTFM signal?
Please advise me, in case of the later, in private to minimize my
disgrace
B-)
mfg lutz
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
*******************************************************************
Lutz Behnke Tel.: 040 / 766 29 1423
TC TrustCenter for Security Fax.: 040 / 766 29 577
in Data Networks GmbH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Werder 1
21073 Hamburg, Germany
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
