Anonymous wrote:
> 
> Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > These changes make it easier to configure OpenSSL on Windows.
> >
> > crypto/x509/x509_def.c:
> > 67c68,71
> > ...
> 
> Jeff has stated on the mailing list that he's a U.S. citizen.
> What happens now?  The changes have been submitted by a U.S. person.
> Is it verboten to put them in?  Or do they have to be provably
> independently discovered?  Hmm... a denial of service attack against
> open source.

The changes were not to crypto source, so I don't believe there is any
problem with them.

If someone were to post patches that are thought to be unexportable,
well, I guess they'd have to be re-engineered. I hope no-one does that.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to