Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> If you think this is wrong and think the "design summit suggestion" >> website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs >> really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin >> up a limited instance. > > +1 on a collaborative scheduling process within each project. > > That's pretty much what we did within the ceilometer core group for > the Juno summit, except that we used a googledocs spreadsheet instead > of an etherpad. > > So I don't think we need to necessarily mandate usage of an etherpad, > just let every project decide whatever shared document format they > want to use. > > FTR the benefit of a googledocs spreadsheet in my view would include > the ease of totalling votes & sessions slots, color-coding candidate > sessions for merging etc.
Good point. I've replaced the wording in the wiki page -- just use whatever suits you best, as long as it's a public document and you can link to it. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev