Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
> On 17/09/2014 23:12, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
>>> This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
>>> As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
>>> [1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning process that
>>> has been posted.
>>> I would like to assume that part of the purpose of the summit is to also
>>> collect feedback from Enterprise Operators and also from smaller ones as
>>> well.
>>> If that is so then I would kindly request that there be some other way
>>> of allowing that part of the community to voice their concerns, and
>>> provide feedback.
>>> Perhaps a track that is not only Operator centric - but also an End-user
>>> focused one as well (mixing the two would be fine as well)
>>> Most of them are not on the openstack-dev list and they do not
>>> participate in the IRC team meetings, simply because they have no idea
>>> that these exist or maybe do not feel comfortable there. So they will
>>> not have any exposure to the process.
>>> My 0.02 Shekels.
>>> [1] -
>> Hi Maish:
>> This thread is about the Design Summit, the Operators Track is a
>> different thing.
>> In Atlanta the Operators Track was organized by Tom Fifield and I have
>> every confidence he is working hard to ensure the operators have a voice
>> in Paris and that those interested can participate.
>> Last summit the Operators Track ran on the Monday and the Friday giving
>> folks who usually spend most of the time at the Design summit to
>> participate and hear the operator's voices. I know I did and I found it
>> highly educational.
>> Thanks,
>> Anita.
> Thanks for the clarification Anita :)

I think the plan is to have the Ops summit run on Monday, with an extra
day on Thursday to continue the discussions. I CCed Tom for more input
on that.

Thierry Carrez (ttx)

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to