On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Joe Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Jay Pipes wrote: >> > On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: >> >> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: >> >>> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack >> >>> session or the logging session from their current joint (and >> >>> conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both. >> >>> And I'd really like to be at both. I'd say the Refstack one would go >> >>> better in the debug slot, as the API stuff is sort of related to the >> >>> logging. Switching with one of the 14:50 sessions might also work. >> >>> >> >>> Just hoping. I really want great participation at all of these >> >>> sessions. >> >> >> >> The "gate debugging" session is most likely going to be dropped at this >> >> point. I don't see a big problem with moving the refstack one to that >> >> slot (the first time). >> >> >> >> Anyone else have a strong opinion on this? >> > >> > Sounds good to me. >> >> Sounds good. >> > > With the "gate debugging" session being dropped due to being the wrong > format to be productive, we now need a new session. After looking over the > etherpad of proposed cross project sessions I think there is one glaring > omission: the SDK. In the "Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise" thread [0] having a > real SDK was one of the top answers. Many folks had great responses that > clearly explained the issues end users are having [1]. As for who could > lead a session like this I have two ideas: Monty Taylor, who had one of the > most colorful explanations to why this is so critical, or Dean Troyer, one > of the few people actually working on this right now. I think it would be > embarrassing if we had no cross project session on SDKs, since there > appears to be a consensus that the making life easier for the end user is a > high priority. > > There are many discussion sessions related to SDKs, they just aren't all in the cross-project slots. Plus these don't require an ATC badge (something users may not have). Application Ecosystem Working Group https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Application_Ecosystem_Working_Group Monday 2:30 (Degas) Thursday 1:40 (Hyatt) I think we can talk about the real SDK at one of these. There's also: Getting Started with the OpenStack Python SDK Monday 4:20 (Room 242AB) Anne The current catch is, the free slot is now at 15:40, so it would compete > with 'How to Tackle Technical Debt in Kilo,' a session which I expect to be > very popular with the same people who would be interested in attending a > SDK session. > > [0] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044766.html > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/6cWQG9oNsr > > >> -- >> Thierry Carrez (ttx) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
