On 10/30/2014 12:12 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 10/30/2014 04:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Jay Pipes wrote: >>>> On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: >>>>> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: >>>>>> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack >>>>>> session or the logging session from their current joint (and >>>>>> conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both. >>>>>> And I'd really like to be at both. I'd say the Refstack one would go >>>>>> better in the debug slot, as the API stuff is sort of related to the >>>>>> logging. Switching with one of the 14:50 sessions might also work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just hoping. I really want great participation at all of these >>>>>> sessions. >>>>> >>>>> The "gate debugging" session is most likely going to be dropped at this >>>>> point. I don't see a big problem with moving the refstack one to that >>>>> slot (the first time). >>>>> >>>>> Anyone else have a strong opinion on this? >>>> >>>> Sounds good to me. >>> >>> Sounds good. >>> >> >> With the "gate debugging" session being dropped due to being the wrong >> format to be productive, we now need a new session. After looking over the >> etherpad of proposed cross project sessions I think there is one glaring >> omission: the SDK. In the "Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise" thread [0] having a >> real SDK was one of the top answers. Many folks had great responses that >> clearly explained the issues end users are having [1]. As for who could >> lead a session like this I have two ideas: Monty Taylor, who had one of the >> most colorful explanations to why this is so critical, or Dean Troyer, one >> of the few people actually working on this right now. I think it would be >> embarrassing if we had no cross project session on SDKs, since there >> appears to be a consensus that the making life easier for the end user is a >> high priority. >> >> The current catch is, the free slot is now at 15:40, so it would compete >> with 'How to Tackle Technical Debt in Kilo,' a session which I expect to be >> very popular with the same people who would be interested in attending a >> SDK session. > > I'm happy to lead this, to co-lead with Dean or to just watch Dean lead > it - although I can promise in any format to start off the time period > with some very colorful ranting. I think I'm less necessary in the tech > debt session, as other than "yes, please get rid of it" I probably don't > have too much more input that will be helpful.
OK, awesome! I'll put you down for now. I could use a proposed session description to put on sched.org. Otherwise, I'll just make something up. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
