On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: > On 12/6/14, 7:42 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip] >>-1 on pixelbeat, since he's been active in reviews on >>various things AFAICT in the last 60-90 days and seems to be still a >>considerate reviewer in various areas. > > I agree -1 for Padraig I'm going to be honest and say I'm confused here. We've always said we expect cores to maintain an average of two reviews per day. That's not new, nor a rule created by me. Padraig is a great guy, but has been working on other things -- he's done 60 reviews in the last 60 days -- which is about half of what we expect from a core. Are we talking about removing the two reviews a day requirement? If so, how do we balance that with the widespread complaints that core isn't keeping up with its workload? We could add more people to core, but there is also a maximum practical size to the group if we're going to keep everyone on the same page, especially when the less active cores don't generally turn up to our IRC meetings and are therefore more "expensive" to keep up to date. How can we say we are doing our best to keep up with the incoming review workload if all reviewers aren't doing at least the minimum level of reviews? Michael -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
