Please see http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/nova-group/90. If we are following the average of 2 reviews per day then proposed list should be updated.
On 12/7/14, 11:19 AM, "Michael Still" <mi...@stillhq.com> wrote: >On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: >> On 12/6/14, 7:42 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >[snip] > >>>-1 on pixelbeat, since he's been active in reviews on >>>various things AFAICT in the last 60-90 days and seems to be still a >>>considerate reviewer in various areas. >> >> I agree -1 for Padraig > >I'm going to be honest and say I'm confused here. > >We've always said we expect cores to maintain an average of two >reviews per day. That's not new, nor a rule created by me. Padraig is >a great guy, but has been working on other things -- he's done 60 >reviews in the last 60 days -- which is about half of what we expect >from a core. > >Are we talking about removing the two reviews a day requirement? If >so, how do we balance that with the widespread complaints that core >isn't keeping up with its workload? We could add more people to core, >but there is also a maximum practical size to the group if we're going >to keep everyone on the same page, especially when the less active >cores don't generally turn up to our IRC meetings and are therefore >more "expensive" to keep up to date. > >How can we say we are doing our best to keep up with the incoming >review workload if all reviewers aren't doing at least the minimum >level of reviews? > >Michael > >-- >Rackspace Australia > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev