Hi Dan, Juergen, I agree that we need to keep the document focused on the 'Management of Networks with Constrained Devices'. The discussion on the networks is because of the management considerations where constrained devices are connected and need to be managed. This network can be indeed constrained or non-constrained.
Cheers, Mehmet > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 12:35 PM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > Cc: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich); Warren Kumari; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-* > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:21:51AM +0000, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > That was my recollection as well. However - see the part of the discussion > > that you > left out - there are still sections that deal with constrained networks in > text > > > > Then either the text needs to go or some of it needs to stay because > sometimes (in some application scenarios) constrained nodes to exist > on constrained networks. In other words, it needs to be looked at on > a case-by-case basis. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
