On 06 Jan 2014, at 7:44 pm, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We mentioned in-car networks as part of Mobile Applications in section 2.10. Do you think a separate use case should be added or it can be seen as covered under M2M services? I believe it would be better to expand the whole in-car networks part into a new section on vehicular networking technologies, since this is a part of emerging networks that will undoubtedly use constrained devices and possibly even constrained networks. Logically, in-car networks should be a sub-class of vehicular networks. Furthermore, it seems that the whole section on mobile applications is mostly focusing purely on special cases of previous sections, or based on special access technologies. Just this difference does not warrant a whole section, in my opinion. It would seem much better to take the special cases (like in-car networks) and merge them into appropriate sections (maybe new ones, like on vehicular networks) and discuss limitations posed by access technologies separately, especially since access technology based limitations would impact not only constrained but, to a slightly lesser degree, regular networking devices within those networks as well. Regards, Anuj Sehgal
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
