I actually don't see a big coverage of Mobile Applications in other use cases. 
Only the use case Transport Applications is covering the mobility aspect 
(actually it includes also vehicle networks).

For example use cases like Environmental Monitoring, Industrial Applications, 
Building Automation etc. use a fixed or wireless network but the devices are 
mainly non-mobile.

May be the sections on Transport Applications and Mobile Applications could be 
merged. Though Mobile Applications can have different facets which go beyond 
transport networks. I think Mobile Applications should be kept separate as they 
differ from fixed/wireless non-mobile applications.

Cheers,
Mehmet

From: ext Sehgal, Anuj [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:57 PM
To: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
Cc: ext Cao,Zhen; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-*


On 06 Jan 2014, at 7:44 pm, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


We mentioned in-car networks as part of Mobile Applications in section 2.10.
Do you think a separate use case should be added or it can be seen as covered 
under M2M services?

I believe it would be better to expand the whole in-car networks part into a 
new section on vehicular networking technologies, since this is a part of 
emerging networks that will undoubtedly use constrained devices and possibly 
even constrained networks. Logically, in-car networks should be a sub-class of 
vehicular networks.

Furthermore, it seems that the whole section on mobile applications is mostly 
focusing purely on special cases of previous sections, or based on special 
access technologies. Just this difference does not warrant a whole section, in 
my opinion. It would seem much better to take the special cases (like in-car 
networks) and merge them into appropriate sections (maybe new ones, like on 
vehicular networks) and discuss limitations posed by access technologies 
separately, especially since access technology based limitations would impact 
not only constrained but, to a slightly lesser degree, regular networking 
devices within those networks as well.

Regards,
Anuj Sehgal
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to