On 2/15/16 15:14, Warren Kumari wrote:
Dear OpsAWG:
This is the second of three messages [0] to determine what the OpsAWG
should do with TACACS+
Should the ID, as presented, or as revised by the WG, be published as
one or more RFCs?
I like the idea of documenting TACACS+ the way it is today as its own
informational RFC. I also agree that extending it with the additional
security measures is good, and separating any enhancements out into
separate working items makes sense.
Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
