Yes. From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Warren Kumari <[email protected]> Date: Monday, February 15, 2016 at 12:14 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [OPSAWG] Detangling - Q2: Publish TACACS+ as a RFC?
Dear OpsAWG: This is the second of three messages [0] to determine what the OpsAWG should do with TACACS+ Should the ID, as presented, or as revised by the WG, be published as one or more RFCs? Scott, Tianran and Warren [0]: The first one was the IPR one ( "Untangling - Explicit call for IPR on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-00") _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
